Top 10 Celebrity 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Nutjobs

September 11, 2009 | Lists

“How big a lunatic do you have to be to witness two jet airliners filled with jet fuel slam into buildings on live TV, triggering a massive inferno that burned for two hours and then think ‘Well, if you believe that’s the cause…’” Bill Maher

We all know roughly what happened eight years ago today; it was one of those “Where were you moments” like when Kennedy was assassinated, or when a rosy-cheeked  Geraldo Rivera took to the air for the first time.

But do we really know? 9/11 conspiracy theorists – truthers, the Colbert-ish name they go by – say absolutely not. Like the people who reckon they faked the moon landing, only often without the tinfoil chapeau and indulged to a far greater degree, 9/11 conspiracy theorists will tell you that the events of September 11 as we have come to understand them –four commercial planes were hijacked by religious nutcases and crashed into World Trade Center buildings one and two and the Pentagon with the fourth going aground in Pennsylvania – did not actually occur, or at least that the official version of those events is deliberately misleading.

The most common 9/11 conspiracy theories suggest that the attacks were an inside job, that the collapse of the World Trade Center and  World Trade Center 7 was brought about by a controlled demolition, and that a commercial airplane did not strike the Pentagon, but rather it was hit by a missile or fighter aircraft. Bush, Cheney, and company were said to have been running around without pants and with their ties loosened hooting in delight at the thought of all the good warring they could now get done.

Other conspiracy theories are of the more rubber room variety: i.e. the “no planers” who suggest that no commercial aircraft could penetrate the steel of the Trade Center towers and that missiles surrounded by holograms were used in a trick that would likely force Criss Angel into a jealous retirement (and not a moment too soon). Then there are those of an anti-Semitic mindset who think it was a Jewish conspiracy, believing – based on completely false information – that 4,000 Jewish people didn’t show up to work at WTC that day because they were somehow tipped off, maybe in a newsletter.

Most 9/11 conspiracy theories have been debunked to the point where there is hardly any bunk left to take out. (Skeptic and Popular Mechanics are two of the best). Even Noam Chomsky, who could find a fascist plot afoot in Dora the Explorer, had this to say on 9/11 conspiracy theories:

I think the Bush administration would have had to be utterly insane to try anything like what is alleged, for their own narrow interests, and do not think that serious evidence has been provided to support claims about actions that would not only be outlandish, for their own interests, but that have no remote historical parallel.

And Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone offers the following concise review of a popular online documentary that is a favorite of 9/11 conspiracy theorists:

“Every time one of those Loose Change dickwads opens his mouth, a Republican somewhere picks up five votes.”

The world we live in – where Bono is asked to do more at a G-8 summit than stay away from it – is one where celebrities have the power to propagate half-baked conspiracy theories, and fans, waylaid by the combined assault of celebrity-dom and the internet on common sense, lap it up. Celebrities may not have an ever-loving clue about the temperature at which steel loses its structural integrity, but their fame will somehow give them the green light to publicly disagree with a professional association of engineers and reckon out loud, “Nah, they just could not have fallen that way. The physics just don’t add up.”

We started this blog with a quote by Bill Maher, undoubtedly a celebrity, but after watching the excellent Religulous, we put him in the camp of comedians with more to offer than jokes about misplaced socks like George Carlin, or Lenny Bruce before he went insane. Organizers at public events that these 10 celebrities are attending may want to be near a plug so they can pull it once they get on the topic of 9/11 — or at least have some air freshener on hand to help mask the heady bouquet of bullshit in the air.

Here then are The Top 10 9/11 Celebrity Conspiracy Theory Nutjobs!

10) Spencer and Heidi Pratt: (Excerpts from an appearance on the radio show of Alex Jones , himself a conspiracy theorist and the man behind “The Obama Deception” ): “We’ve been nonstop researching the Internet … for information for at least a month all day every day,” said Heidi. Spencer added: “From your [Jones'] research, it [9/11] 100 percent is [an inside job] … “I want to throw up.”

.. Don’t we all.  In England, most people would agree that these two are a pair of pratts before hearing the surname. Spencer and Heidi, best known for their turn on the self-indulgent rich kid zoo called The Hills, prove the danger of giving a broadband internet connection to people with basic literacy skills and the inability to think critically. Their “non-stop” research on the internet combined with Jones’ conspiracy video led them not only to believe that 9/11 was an inside job, but the toe-headed pair were also clued into the fact that a secret plot to install chips in people is fulfilling biblical prophecy — Heidi: “My body belongs to Jesus Christ. I am a disciple of Jesus, and I will speak out to Christians … this chip is the end of humanity.” — and, continuing on in that vein of the oxygen-deprived religious nutcase, that birth control pills are actually just turds from Satan’s rabbit — “most women are suicidal sometimes on it.”

Crazy conspiracy theorist right up there with those getting signals from the mothership via the beer fridge? Not so, says Heidi. “Conspiracy is a word they’ve created to make people sound crazy, but that’s not what God says,” she says. “You can persecute us, you can say whatever you want. ” And, unfortunately, the same holds true for these two.

9) Woody Harrelson: I am reading a book now called The New Pearl Harbor by David Ray Griffin.  I’ve been stuck in the position of ignoring my gut — knowing things don’t stack up.  Even though our government obviously took advantage of 9/11 by making it their “Reichstag”, I told myself, “Surely they weren’t involved”.  After reading this book I can’t doubt that our government was at least complicit in allowing 9/11 to happen.”

Woody Harrelson has gone from wiping down the bar at Cheers to serving as the poster boy for every sort of liberal/hippy cause imaginable, including good ones like legalizing marijuana. Woody has the rare and odd distinction of being not only the propagator of a popular conspiracy theory, but the son of a subject of a major one. His father, Charles Harrelson, was widely thought by conspiracy theorists to have been one of the “Three Tramps” seen in a box car behind Dealey Plaza after JFK was assassinated. The elder Harrelson first denied then boasted about his role in JFK’s murder, though — like the claims of a government turning against its own people on 9/11 — no solid supporting evidence was ever found to place him in Dallas that day.

8) Mos Def: “I don’t believe it was bin Laden today.  I don’t believe it was never him … I’m sorry, I’m from the projects, I know danger. I don’t feel no danger from that shit… Highly-educated people in all areas of science have spoken on the fishiness around the whole 9/11 theory.”

This quote by Mos Def — who undeniably turned in the best performance ever by an American hip-hop star in a British science-fiction comedy film — must have at least partially inspired the quote at the top of this blog. Mos Def made this statement amid a litany of craziness that included him stating that the moon landing was faked on an episode of Real Time With Bill Maher.

7) Willie Nelson: “I saw one fall, and it was just so symmetrical, I said wait a minute. I just saw that last week at the casino in Las Vegas, and you see these implosions all the time. And the next one fell, and I said, hell, there’s another one – and they’re trying to tell me that an airplane did it, and I can’t go along with that… “What does it take for us to realize we’re having the wool pulled over our eyes one more time?”

Willie Nelson is one of the greatest country music songwriters of all time, a man who did his best to get out of paying taxes for as long  as possible, and the face of fun old guy pot smoking… It is hard to find a cooler person than Willie Nelson.  But his 9/11 conspiracy theory, predicated as it is on his having seen a building being blown up in Vegas, is like that idea for a novel you scribble down while higher than an eagle with a rocket up its ass – it seems brilliant while one’s burning, but is best binned and forgotten by the time you get off the couch.

6) Tom DeLonge (Blink 182 singer): “We do know that the buildings came down in a fashion extremely similar to a controlled demolition of a building – we do know that expertise that is needed to fly those gigantic planes into that exact location could never have been achieved by someone that just learned how to fly a small plane.”

For those who ‘blinked’ and missed Blink 182′s one hit song, they were part of the skate punk movement, the founders of which are now in their mid-30s and probably wear all sorts of padding to stave off injury in the event of a fall. DeLonge takes Willie’s controlled demolition theory a step further, by saying — with the certainty only someone who knows exactly nothing about what he’s talking about can muster — that the 9/11 hijackers would not have been skilled enough as pilots to stage the attacks. Salon.com in an Ask The Pilot article addressing 9/11 questions, quoted someone who did fly planes for living as saying:”…Striking the Pentagon, or navigating along the Hudson River to Manhattan on a cloudless morning, with the sole intention of steering head-on into a building, did not require a mastery of airmanship.”

DeLonge went for the low-hanging fruit by playing on everybody who isn’t peculiar’s dislike for Dick Cheney when he said the the then-vice president  “knew that the planes [were] coming in and he capped the order to leave it alone so it could hit.”

Blink 182 times if you believe:

a) a conspiracy this big could ever have come off without someone spilling the beans and providing definitive proof of said beans and b) that the tongues of everyone who knew anything about said conspiracy would still be capable of wagging and not be, say, out of their heads.

 

5) Marion Cotillard: “We see other towers of the same kind being hit by planes. Are they burned? There was a tower, I believe it was in Spain, which burnt for 24 hours. It never collapsed. None of these towers collapsed. And there [in NY], in a few minutes, the whole thing collapsed.”

It pains us to cast aspersions on a hot French actress who undoubtedly sounded very sexy while saying these crazy things, but, in addition to the above, Marion Cotillard — Oscar winner, 2008 –offered what is likely THE craziest reason anyone has come up with to explain why the US blew up the towers: it was to avoid all that pesky upkeep! “It was a money sucker because they were finished, it seems to me, by 1973, and to re-cable all that, to bring up-to-date all the technology and everything, it was a lot more expensive, that work, than destroying them.”

(Trade Center official getting an estimate on renovations prior to 9/11): “How much? And the re-cabling? You sure you didn’t add just add an extra zero there? What are you guys, union? Screw that noise. Let’s blow it up.”

We reckon even the no planers would be saying, “What the hell is she going on about?” at this point.

4) Jesse Ventura: How could those buildings fall at the speed of gravity – if you put a stopwatch on them both of those World Trade Center buildings were on the ground in ten seconds – how can that be? Never before in the annals of history has a fire caused a steel structure building to fall to the ground like these two did.”

Jesse Ventura used to dress up in a feather boa and tights and stage pre-determined wrestling matches, but the suspension of disbelief required during his wrestling days pales compared to that needed to buy his 9/11 theories. Ventura, in Alex Jones’ video, is said to have ‘moved to Mexico to escape fascism’ (and in this picture looks like Sean Connery in Zardoz).

3) Rosie O’Donnell: It is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved — World Trade Center 7.  World Trade 1 and 2 got hit by planes.  7, miraculously, the first time in history, steel was melted by fire.  It is physically impossible.

Rosie O’Donnell is a one woman argument for upgrading basic cable and was a former host of The View, the TV equivalent of an induced coma. O’Donnell, no stranger to having an outsize gob and sticking her foot in it (it’s actually large enough to accommodate both of Shaquille O’Neal’s size 23s), took Jesse the Body’s contention one step with her claim that fire had never melted steel prior to 9/11. As Jonah Goldberg of the National Review wrote: “This, of course, came as news to steelworkers, blacksmiths, firefighters, manufacturers of samurai swords, and other fools who hadn’t realized that steel is forged in magic furnaces using dragon breath and pixie dust.”

2) Janeane Garofalo: “9/11 was an inside job!!  I have come to this conclusion about that. …  I think all Air America phone-in callers should open by saying, ’9/11 was an inside job.  We can all agree on that.’, then get on with their specific question or comment.  We should re-condition the listening audience to accept the Truth about 9/11 as the gospel.”

Janeane Garofalo is the world’s third most famous hairy, squat, Sicilian American after Rachael Ray and Danny De Vito, but neither as unintentionally or intentionally funny, respectively, as either (actually, De Vito was unexpectedly funny on a show nobody associates with humor of any kind whatsoever, The View). First Rosie, now Janeane, when did all the wisecracking supporting actresses in early 90s comedies turn into such vocal moon-howlers?

1) Charlie Sheen: “It seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75 percent of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions.”

Charlie Sheen, star of Two and a Half Men (and one quarter wit), is the bull goose loony of the celebrity truther movement. In better days, Charlie Sheen made headlines the honest way: he earned them by being one of the most debauched individuals in Hollywood, no small feat. These days, when he’s not exchanging bon mots with the husky kid from Fraser, Sheen works overtime in his role as celebrity spokesman for the truther movement. In a bizarre, and from a mental health standpoint, troubling, move, Sheen wrote a script of a fictional conversation between himself and Barack Obama, which, along with his 9/11 walk in wonderland also included the even fiction — that Obama likes and watches Two and a Half Men.  He also compiled a video message to Obama. The video concerns the alleged cover up involving real estate mogul Larry Silverstein’s infamous ‘pull it’ remark, which, if you are living proof that gray matter consists mostly of fatty tissue, you construe as an order to demolish building 7 (because naturally as a multi billionaire you’d be motivated to collect on the world’s largest ever ‘insure-and-burn’ and then ruin everything by accidentally blurting out your clandestine plan on national TV).

The Shark Guys are the authors of Tastes Like Human: The Shark Guys’ Book of Bitingly Funny Lists and The Man Who Scared a Shark to Death and Other True Tales of Drunken Debauchery (Penguin).

PLEASE CHECK OUT OUR LIST OF THE TOP 10 WORST CELEBRITY HEIRESSES

radio show
Buy the New E-Book Tastes Like Human



Comments

116 Responses | TrackBack URL | Comments Feed

  1. Don’t worry kids! All this article has done is made the truth movement more recognizable in the mainstream.

    Thanks for doing your part Shark Guys! Don’t worry, one day you’ll figure it out.

    • If the government lies, does this automatically mean there’s a conspiracy theory at work? If it was an inside job, it was amazing how demolition crews were able to wire all the explosives necessary, which would consist of miles of wires & caps, all whilst the building is burning and have no one notice them at all, and have it go off perfectly. It takes professionals days if not weeks to prep a site for a charged demo, but these guys did it in a matter of hours, and in ridiculous burning temperatures, and left no trace of caps or wires anywhere…??? To quote the biggest truther/loser – they must’ve had “tiger blood”.

      • Ricky, truthers never said WTC 1, 2 or 7 were wired the same day as the three 9/11 demolitions! But that’s typical propaganda from the so-called ‘debunkers’. If you can fabricate the bunk yourself it makes it much easier to de-bunk and contributes to the over all absurdity that they like to attach to what really happened.

        Also why didn’t ‘The Shark Guys’ include celebrity 911 truther (and Jew) Ed Asner from their list of ‘Top 10 Celebrity 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Nutjobs’? Maybe because he has way too much credibility to be considered a ‘Nutjob’ and would detract from their premise that all truthers belong in an insane asylum?

      • Ricky, you shouldn’t post if you haven’t read up on the subject. Am glad you asked the question on HOW they wired it. Easy: go watch any documentary made on the subject and you’ll understand. You’re obviously not spun up yet. That’s easily fixed. Some say the building was wired WEEKS ahead of time. It’s documented that the bomb-sniffing dogs that used to walk through daily (after the earlier attempt of blowing up the WTC happened) was STOPPED two weeks before the planes hit. Two weeks?! Isn’t that a long enough window to get explosives (thermite?) planted? Answer: yes. Also, I hope you would ask: why did they stop their walk-thru with the bomb-sniffing dogs? Who ordered that? Ask the questions…hopefully find the answers. It’s what the truther movement is all about: asking questions, not blaming government…

      • I heard there were unusual closures of parts of the towers in the months leading up to 9-11, sufficient to for crews to lay charges. You probably misunderstood if you thought someone was suggesting that demolition of crews went in after the planes.

    • 10 years…and not a single truther has been able to get ONE scientist to submit a scientific paper to a respected journal. Jones and his primer paint chip submitted his to a vanity journal, paid a couple grand, had his buddy review it, and VIOLA! Peer reviewed paint chips turned into NA NU NA NU Therm*te. Who knows truthers…maybe they next 10 years will be better.

    • Nutters….you all come in different colors and walks of life. Celebrity does not always mean brains.

  2. Oh look, another clichéd journalistic hit-piece!

    Sigh, lets give the authors of this childish rubbish the benefit of the doubt…perhaps they are just a little slowwwww.

    I guess there will always be those people that are the last to find out when the milkman is doing their wife..

    • Yup: another journalistic hit piece. You know, I’ve spent many, many hours comparing the difference between liberal and conservative sites to see what respondents say about the opposing teams. Liberals resort to character assassination and name-calling about 95% of the time where conservatives resort to it about 5% of the time. Liberals offer counter arguments about 10% of the time and conservatives offer counter arguments about 70% of the time. This entire hit-piece is nothing but name-calling and character assassination. Notice the names chosen to represent the Truther movement are all “fringe” people, B-listers, or people not-much taken seriously by many? Where are all the mainstream Truthers being represented…like Geraldo Rivera, just to name one. I’d have rather seen some REAL commentary in here…like a professional opinion on how 2,000F degree heat could melt a building after 90 minutes of applied flame when it’s widely known to take 3,000F heat to even have a chance to start getting the WTC steel beams hot enough to start bending… I think the real conspiracy theorists are the ones who are defying logic and science and are attempting to hold their fragile worlds together via character assassination and rhetoric…like ignoring how building #7 at the WTC could come down at free-fall speed and yet they not even dare to ask “HOW”. So sad…so disgusting. No more journalistic integrity. Shame on them all.

  3. You should add the “Jersey Girls” to the list. The four widows of 9/11 who read every article they could after losing their husbands and realized how much misinformation was going on, stories changing, or the stories not making sense, etc. What lunatics. They banded together and demanded answers. And all the New Yorkers who want a new investigation. Nut jobs. I mean, they were there but what do they know? I just listen to official reports. I don’t find it odd that NORAD didn’t respond for those two hours before the planes hit (or missed) their targets. I don’t find it odd that the plane in Pennsylvania and the plane at the Pentagon were never recovered. Not even substantial debris that would make it identifiable. I don’t think that it is odd that WTC 7 collapsed despite not even being hit by a plane. You know what else? I will completely ignore all the buildings that have burned for days (not a dying fire like the WTC) and didn’t even come close to falling down. I mean, that Jet fuel is wondrous stuff!!!
    I’ll just listen to official reports, not do any of my own research, and laugh at anyone else that has the balls to say something.

    Seriously, people like me aren’t wearing tinfoil hats thinking its 1984. We actually do our OWN research. It is about truth, not conspiracy.
    And nobody takes loose change seriously. Are you retarded?
    Were you just one of the people that was fooled by loose change, found out it was all bullshit, and got bitter? yeah.

  4. This is a lot of ad homenim. Sure some of the theorists are crazy, but this should not detract from the more legitimate questions. There really are questions that have remained unanswered, and the 9/11 commission was stonewalled from answering them.

  5. If you believe any of this crap, then you are truly retarded. The Pratt’s? Rosie? Woddy? Wow, isn’t it amazing how all these conspiracy theorists were left wing, anti-Bush prior to the 9/11 attacks. Why would they have reason to lie? pfff, gimmie a break.

  6. You are some pompously certain bastards. Your unfaltering, blind certainty on the matter, when you don’t really know jack shit for sure, just goes to show your level of reasoning (or lack thereof). To say that any of these theories are definitely true is just as absurd as to say that they are not.

    Ya’ll are a gaggle of retards, a bunch of cackling fools, and if someday it comes out that Jeanine Garofolo is right (unlikely as it may be), I hope you finally feel like the dumbasses you are.

    No offense.

    • “You guys are a gaggle of retards, pompous bastards, don’t know jack sh*t, cackling fools, and are a bunch of dumbasses…

      …but No Offense” Ha Ha!

      Priceless Monkey…you give the legitimately mentally challenged a bad wrap, crackhead.

  7. ….there are some real obama lovin idiots out there…

  8. Truthers are proof that it’s possible to be a fully-functional moron in today’s society (many of these people actually hold down good jobs while being utter flakes). Forget the official story, the 9/11 commission’s reports, or any other source with a potential conflict of interest (in the mind of complete nut-jobs). Just read Popular Mechanics or Purdue University’s breakdown of the facts (not to mention the half-dozen documentaries that gather all the facts produced by legitimate groups and compare them to the Truther nitwits) and it’s utterly impossible to believe any of the douchebags trying to sell their “I’m smarter than you” conspiracy crap.

    Oh yeah, the funniest part of your article was Matt Taibbi calling someone else a dickwad. Seriously, that’s like Pam Anderson calling another woman a slut.

    • Des said: “Truthers are proof that it’s possible to be a fully-functional moron in today’s society (many of these people actually hold down good jobs while being utter flakes).”

      Once again: name-calling and character assassination. Typical. Des, it’s not moronic or flaky to question illogical things when they’re put before you. Study philosophy, study how to be a good citizen, study “free thinking”. You spout rhetoric, not facts. Give facts.

      I see our education system has really dumbed down those who criticize the 9/11 truther movement. There’s no real thought left. I see a lot of opinion and rhetoric injected here as somehow worth something. No one discussing facts. No one attempting to answer questions. At least Truthers are ASKING legitimate questions. The guy who wrote that Popular Mechanics piece was debunked by thousands of engineers and architects…and that writer quotes a couple sources to the THOUSANDS that debunk him?! Wow…bring him into a court room and watch him get slaughtered as he’s put under cross-examination.

      Go ahead, throw the word “moron” and “flake” around…offer nothing substantial while you’re at it. Let those who passed the third grade get on with the adult discussions it will take to shed some light and bring some truth on this subject. No cookie for you!

  9. I liked the article. Good work.

    To Michael, who has done his OWN research and has come to the conclusion that not even substantial debris that would make United Airlines Flight 93 identifiable, I’d like to see your OWN PRIMARY SOURCES that counter what I’ve heard, that the remains of all passengers on board, as well as the flight recorder box (which makes it extremely identifiable) were recovered?

    Get a grip, conspiracy theorists, you’re wrong. There’s a reason the ten most famous celebrities who agree with you are generally considered idiots and it’s not only because they believe 9/11 was an inside job.

    • There are many more celebs4truth than this! Just come to http://www.celebs4truth.com and see for yourself that there are many, many more celebs, and many more truths to find out!

    • J.J. Your comments were fairly thoughtful…until the end. Then any observant person could see that you took the author’s approach too seriously. You’re slamming the 10 celebs? Criticizing them and minimizing their take on the subject? But don’t you realize that the author PICKED those 10 SPECIFICALLY to discredit the movement? He picked B-listers who he then trash-talked, even showing goofy pictures of them to discredit them even more, making them look like nut-jobs…and you fell for it. You SHOULD be looking at the stable-minded, HIGHLY educated engineers, architects, pilots and TENS OF THOUSANDS of other VERY credible people who can bring a million years of experience to the investigation that should be ensuing. No, instead you’d rather name-call and call it all good. Oh, and throw some more labels out there about how stupid people are while you do nothing to protect your own image and credibility…which, by the way, you no longer have any cuz your comments show you’re feeling your way through this whole subject – not THINKING your way through.

      Did all thought die? Can no one use logic anymore? Does no one study math or engineering or even just know how to DEBATE anymore? Ya gotta bring something to the table guys…anything other than namecalling…(sigh).

  10. J.J.
    You asked for my evidence and said it contradicted what you have “heard”. Well, obviously. That is the whole problem, isn’t it?
    I will just link some videos for you.

    1.Firefighters describing the collapse
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXD3bAbZCow
    2.Pennsylvania crash
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99rcYiG_Syw
    3.Dr. Steve Jones’ thermite theory
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY
    4.Bush makes a mistake
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZBmfRBv-Go
    5.WTC 7 (shows a controlled demo next to it)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58h0LjdMry0
    6.One of the aforementioned “Jersey Girls” (discusses NORAD)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rukxI_GLc3w

    And people that question the official story
    http://patriotsquestion911.com/

  11. I don’t claim to know what happened that day, and the idea of such a conspiracy being possible is so monstrous as to make me shudder; however, in reading your article I can’t help but notice that the entire thing is one ad-hominem attack after another, while not citing any actual evidence or counter-evidence, as it were, just “they’re crazy, good thing i’m smarter than them, tee hee”…not quite sure what you hope to accomplish with this piece, but convincing it is not. That is all.

  12. Take a look at Charlie Shhen’s video for Barack Obama below:
    http://www.infowars.com/charlie-sheen-issues-challenge-to-critics-on-alex-jones-show/

    We all know 911 was an iside job! It’s as obvious as the nose on your face!
    Al Qaeda is a close as your Government Rep in the USA!
    Much of the administration that was in George Bush’s Government is the same administration as is working in Obama’s Government! The new Government is looking like the old Government!

    Demand a thorough investigation! Don’t leave a singke stone unturned! Use the best honest engineers and lawmen and scientests in the world!
    What Charlie has here are profound questions that have never been answered clearly enough for public understanding and approval of investigation!

  13. How do you go from “I have unanswered questions about 9/11″ to “Thousands of people in the government participated in a massive cover up”?

    It’s like hearing a noise in your house late at night and assuming it’s a ghost or seeing a light in the sky and knowing for certain that it’s an alien spacecraft, then refusing to accept any other possible explanation for the phenomenon. The burden of proof is on YOU to show us that it’s a ghost/spaceship, not us.

    BTW, global warming is real, the moon landing wasn’t faked, there are no spaceships at Area 51, no black helicopters, no FEMA death camps, the Holocaust really happened, and there is no such thing as the Illuminati.

  14. The Average 9/11 Truther is either a sad, paranoid person who believes that all the ills in life can be attributed to some shadowy government conspiracy or they’re a pseudo-intellectual who refuses to respect the experience and authority of experts and instead substitutes their own theories and opinions in place of critical thought.

    Then there’s the UNCOMMON Truthers who have somehow used this nonsense to spin a profit. Alex Jones once claimed he spends a million dollars a year getting his message out, a statement which makes you wonder A) Where he’s getting the money and B)How much of that “million” he ISN’T spending. There are 9/11 Truthers who actually make money off this odious nonsense. People who exploit a national tragedy and the paranoia of fools turn two pennies into ten dimes.

    It’s sad, it’s pathetic, and when you actually ask these dirtbags where they get their money or who funds them or how that money is used…guess what they do? They play the “I need to protect the brave men and women who are standing up to the evil NWO/Men in Black/Illuminati/Grays/Lizard People/{insert paranoid fantasy here}! I would never divulge my sources and you’re one of “them” for asking”.

    As for most of the celebrities on this list: They’re either going for shock value, easily influenced by poison spewing fools (I’m looking at you Alex Jones), or heavily medicated by illegal narcotics. You have to understand that the average Hollywood celebrity never graduated college, barely graduated high school, and rarely if ever reads a real book from a mainstream publisher. These people are stupid, often professional so, and if they took a moment to pull their heads out of their rich, pampered asses, they’d realize how stupid this all sounds.

    • I see a pattern here after reading so many inflammatory remarks: The Truthers all seem to have actually read documents, watched the evidence via documentaries and are actually spun up on the subject of the lies of 9/11, while the name-callers and non-thinkers who TRY to argue against them haven’t really read or watched anything on the subject at all. It’s pretty obvious. If you Truthers want a good laugh, go back through and read all the “anti” comments made and count them up…you’re all dealing with a bunch of “feelers” not “thinkers”…it’s pretty obvious after you read their flames and cries for attention.

      I’ve had enough. I’ve cast enough pearls before the swine here… No sense in y’all wasting your time anymore – I’ll waste no more of mine.

      “MOST” Truthers I know have been to college. Most are analytical. Hell, most of the ones I know have security clearances and are either in the military, government contractors or DoD civilians. Highly educated, very thoughtful…just know how to see all the questions which are still unanswered. Most know they’ll never be answered, and though they don’t like it, well, that’s just the way life is. JFK’s generation is STILL trying to figure out who killed him…and no one yet knows where Hoffa’s body is buried… But let’s all name-call people who are still asking “why”…that makes it all okay, eh?

  15. 1. This video claims explosive were used at 3:08… dude the building was falling for like 3 seconds before the puffs of smoke were jettisoned. It’s obviously from the pressure created by the pancaking floors and not dynamite.

    God you conspiracy theorists are so fucking stupid. How do you fuck-asses survive to make it through the end of each day?

    All your “PROOF” is just theories, guesses, questions, and frantic eye-witness reports… none of which are reliable.

    • No, it isn’t. It’s based on soooo much more. It’s based on collecting evidence and making sense of it. What’s your proof based on? The  ‘reliable’ official report by the people we say did it in the first place? Or did you go meet one of the still alive supposed attacks and he confirmed for you that he did it? Maybe Dick Cheney’s congealed spunk is just keeping you from opening your eyes. Did you know your authorities have been rehashing Bin Laden videos for the last 10 years to make you think he’s still alive? Yeah, didn’t think so.

    • I notice you have some good ideas, but you lack information. I did not question 9/11 for a long time but then certain doubts crept in. There are too many coincidences and unexplained phenomena. The Silversteins, leaseholders, didn’t go to work at the WTC on 9/11. John O’Neill, an expert on bin Laden, leaves his job at the FBI for WTC Security and dies on his first day on the job. Jim Pierce, the President’s cousin moves his meeting out of the WTC on 9/11. White House insiders started taking anthrax antibiotics secretly on 9/11 three weeks before there was any known threat. The first victim, Robert Stevens, had published a picture of Jenna Bush sitting on another girl’s lap. Jeb Bush signs a plan for martial law in Florida the week before 9/11. Marvin Bush headed security at the WTC for Securacom up until 9/11. Secret War Games with Cheney in charge are going on on 9/11. Giuliani abandons Building Seven at 9:00 because “he’s told the Towers would fall,” but they’re not warned. A national bio warfare game is scheduled for 9/12 but FEMA arrives to meet a day early. In 2008, Bruce Ivins is about to be accused of the anthrax attack but he “commits suicide” and is cremated without an autopsy. When James Wilson won’t say Saddam got uranium from Africa administration insiders out his CIA wife. Firefighters, explosions, Building Seven all ignored by the 9/11 Commission. The Executive Director, Zelikow is a Bush insider.

  16. [...] You can read the rest of the origins of the truthers here. Or the top 10 Celebrity truther nutjobs. [...]

  17. Michael,

    I asked for primary sources and you give me a series of Youtube videos… what a joke.

    To quote you: “You asked for my evidence and said it contradicted what you have “heard”. Well, obviously. That is the whole problem, isn’t it?”

    Yes, it is the whole problem. It’s a problem because I admit that the conclusions I’ve made are from what I’ve “heard” (AKA secondary sources). Seems to me that you’re basing your conclusions on the same sources I am, except you’re standing on the pedestal saying that I’m swallowing what some bigwigs want me to believe while you’ve dug deeper than my feeble mind has either bothered or been capable of. You’ve shown no evidence so far that you’ve done any of your OWN research.

    I’ll only answer the video of the Pennsylvania crash because frankly, I won’t be bothered to individually refute all of them. The fact is that the most damning evidence from those LIVE REPORTS which happened very near to the time of tragedy is that there’s no debris in the crater. Fact of the matter is that craters are not a good place for collecting debris after an explosion, especially a very large explosion. This video is only evidence of hearing only what you want to hear and then ignoring everything from that point forward. Debris from the crash that identified the plane and its occupants was found later by people who were specifically looking for the debris. To claim that nothing that could have identified that flight was ever found is a flat out lie and the video you posted does nothing to support it.

  18. wow. did you even watch the videos? I don’t think you did.
    “I’d like to see your OWN PRIMARY SOURCES that counter what I’ve heard, that the remains of all passengers on board, as well as the flight recorder box (which makes it extremely identifiable) were recovered?”

    There were no bodies. So, you heard wrong, yes?

    And the last link is not a video. You should read through it.

    Just tell me, when in history has a plane crashed into the ground and been obliterated into nothingness? You really don’t find it odd that they didn’t recover a plane there or at the Pentagon? Of course, they would find some piece later that would help them identify the plane and the people on board. That is the whole point in a cover up. But you have to think, they sure did solve the whole case rather quickly for not having much to go on. I mean not a single plane was recovered in any of the wreckage of any of the sites.

    And I don’t know…maybe you did watch the videos. Did you see the part on the Italian report where they said the 9/11 commission report never even mentions WTC 7? The building that fell having not even been hit by a plane. Not a very thorough investigation.

    The reason I sent you a bunch of videos was for a couple of reasons. Initial reactions of the firemen: they hear explosions in the building and say it is like a controlled demo.
    There is also the point of the steel still being on fire for weeks after the attacks. Jet fuel burns once and only once. I don’t care how hot you think it gets, that just shouldn’t happen. Dr. Jones goes over this in detail.

    Bush lying…it is interesting. I’m sure you know exactly where you were that morning and what you were doing. How does the President get his story wrong?

    Look, this is what it comes down to. Truthers are people that have looked at the evidence and are simply saying that it doesn’t add up. And that there should be a new and complete investigation. No one thinks you have a feeble brain. I was in your position for a very long time. The whole idea of this being a cover up is a monstrous thought.

  19. http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm

    I’m not an expert on airline crashes, but I do know that not many things on Earth are built to withstand crashing into something at more than 300 miles per hour and then burning. They did recover enough remains to identify everybody aboard flight 93. Perhaps I’m reading too much into what you’re saying, but it sounds like you’re looking for nearly complete corpses and large chunks of fuselage? Without those pieces, are you saying that the debris that was recovered was placed there or doesn’t exist at all?

    Firemen are no more qualified to recognize a controlled demolition than you or I. They heard very loud noises and likened it to something they could recognize, that’s what people do. Of course, a steel structure weighing in the thousands of tons is going to make very loud noises when it fails. The fact that they were interviewed as a group weakens the point further, as group testimony is known to be even spottier.

    As for Dr. Jones’ theory, it’s too strong a word to even call it a theory. He’s not an expert on civil engineering or forensics of any type. While he may be a physics professor and very knowledgeable about how thermite works, the civil engineering professor at BYU, the same university he called home disagrees with his hypothesis. The fact is that it seems as though he’s going through side channels for peer review to try to get a beneficial outcome. He lacks the approval of a bevy of respected sources whose backing would help his argument tremendously.

    http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm

    • Sorry JJ,

      Even if you could find one shred evidence of this alleged plane’s manifest passengers at the Pentagon site, which you simply will not; even if you flew a plane into it at Mach 5, even if you burned at 2500º for a day – Two, not 1, TWO! RB-211 6Ton Titanium Alloy Rolls Royce Turbofan Engines do not vaporize in a crash or fire leaving barely recognizable bits and pieces. Where are the sections of the engine’s WING SPARS…these are NOT flimsy pieces of SHEET METAL. Wing spars are designed to take 2+ times the MAX GROSS WEIGHT of an aircraft. There should be burn marks not 16-20ft, but of at least 124ft wide or close to it, which is the wingspan on a 757 and happens to be w h e r e t h e f u e l i s s t o r e d! – mkay? Landing gear alloyed with Tungsten, are also immense parts not easily destructible or lost for that matter. None of the pictures I’ve seen online convince even the most naive observer that a plane crashed there – in any case, due to the lack of background, most suggest that they’re either pictures of other wreckage or the junked aircraft parts were planted. Where are the other 9 wheel hubs; did ALL of the tires burn off clean? Unless of course they were removed for ease of transporting / planting?

      But here’s probably the best question yet on this subject:

      - Why the seizures and confiscations of over 84 sources of video footage from around the Pentagon, proof of what really happened, leaving us with a ½ second glimpse of what STILL LOOKS LIKE a cruise missile – from what appears to be an angle behind a bush or sitting in someone’s car? A multi-billion dollar-a-year agency and we have ONE low-res camera a foot off the ground to capture this?

      Why not put all our speculation and demands to rest and show us real tangible, verifiable footage to support your “official” report? We truthers are so “paranoid” and “hopelessly lost in theories”, we beg that you do do what is in your superior humane obligation and return us to sanity by showing us irrefutable proof. Save us from darkness and show us the light.

      Please help us, enlightened ones -

      There are none more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe to be free.

      Think-it’s not illegal yet.

      • So there should be a cuttie-cutter image of the planes on the buildings? This isn’t Looney Tunes, but you are looney.

  20. look for the coroner’s statement. He said there were no bodies and not even a drop of blood.

  21. I did a quick Google search of this and I turned up things like this (from the Loose Change site)

    According to a Washington Post story, about 1500 human remains were recovered from Flight 93′s crash site. The coroner only spent 20 minutes at the crash site, before the site was excavated for bodies, so it’s not surprising that he didn’t see blood.

    http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/loose_change/flight93.html

    As I said earlier, there were no bodies recovered because they were blown apart and burned.

    from the AP:

    Coroner Wallace Miller has held the site as a coroner’s death scene since Sept. 11, 2001,
    when the hijacked plane crashed into an abandoned strip mine in Somerset County, killing 40 passengers and crew.
    Miller and a group of more than two dozen volunteers this week made a final sweep of the property, looking for debris. The group found airplane debris near a section of downed evergreens and a small amount of human remains…

    http://911review.org/Wiki/Flight93Somerset.shtml

    Once again, are you saying that the remains were planted there or are you still only relying on quotes that came out within hours of the tragedy?

    I’m not sure what you’re expecting them to have found there… complete corpses?

  22. keep thinking.

  23. My dear Truthers:

    Let’s say that George Bush and/or the Illuminati did this. Thousands of people must have been involved.

    How come not one of them came forward or mysteriously disappeared?

    And if the gov’t’s capable of such barbarity for seemingly “no reason” why haven’t you fled or gone to a commune.

    And WHY ON EARTH are you writing on a public site where your IP can be tracked! If they can carry out the intricacies of 9/11 almost flawlessly, they’re probably on your doorstep right around now.

  24. So let me get this straight… if you dont agree one hundred percent with the government on how 9/11 happened you are a nutjob… honestly you guys seem like the nutjobs to be so 100 percent sure!

  25. I never said that people who doubt the 9/11 commission’s findings are nutjobs, I’m saying these 10 celebrities are nutjobs.

    What does “keep thinking” mean, Michael? You haven’t answered my questions. you’ve completely ignored my numerous postings stating that human remains were found. It seems like all of your evidence to the contrary regarding flight 93 is taken from within hours or days from the actual event and ignores everything from that point forward.

    I’ll ask one last time. Are you saying those remains were planted as a cover up or are you denying that the remains that are part of documented fact never existed? If you’re claiming they’re part of a cover up, I once again ask you for what in your OWN research corroborates such a claim?

  26. keep thinking just meant…try to add it up. I don’t think you can.

    http://killtown.911review.org/flight93/crash-comparisons.html

    here is what a crash site should look like. There are parts of the plane in each crash and the craters are much bigger.

    on the same site, you can read through eyewitness testimony. Do I think the body parts were planted? well an entire plane just disintegrates after crashing into the ground. yet there are still body parts? I don’t know. It just doesn’t go with the official story in my opinion. but I can’t go making claims that they planted the body parts there. Perhaps the plane was shot down? I don’t know. Nobody saw it happen. I’m sure you’ve seen the pictures, though. And the FBI claimed it recovered 95% of the plane wreckage. I never saw anything bigger than that engine. I guess the whole thing went into the ground.

    This is all that matters…the investigation was never complete. WTC 7 is missing from the 9/11 commission report. So, we don’t know everything that really happened and there is no way to argue with that. I am just glad that Japan is willing to explore the possibility of a cover up.

  27. by the way, the “i don’t think you can” comment just meant i don’t think its possible. not that you’re incapable.

  28. Michael – flight 93 crashed into a reclaimed strip mine. The soil was very loosely compacted, so the plane was essentially buried. Do your own research and stop watching YouTube videos: they addle your brain.

  29. yes, supposedly 80% of the plane went into the ground. Where was the other 20% and why don’t we ever see the plane in the excavation photos if 95% of the plane was recovered?

    but you seriously believe the plane went into the ground? lol okay.

  30. Michael,

    Thanks for clearing up that “I don’t think you can comment”, admittedly I did read it the wrong way at first.

    I’ve intentionally stayed away from the WTC 7 argument because I don’t have any answers for it. I admit that it does resemble a controlled demolition and that I have insufficient reasoning for why the building fell in the first place, but lack sufficient evidence one way or another to make a conclusion. I agree that the 9/11 commission is riddled with problems. I stop short of believing that it’s a U.S. Government conspiracy to enhance a warmongering agenda.

    As for Flight 93, I believe the soft earth of the reclaimed mining area has a lot to do with the fact that much is not visible from eyewitness testimony or what photos came out recent to the crash. The flight comparison site you posted has a lot of seemingly damning data, but not one instance of a crash that closely resembles the conditions of the ground. If the plane had been shot down in midair, there would have been large pieces of debris found that would closely resemble the lockerbie explosion. I’m not sure they would have been able to cover that up.

    The bottom line for me is that the inconsistencies in the WTC 7 collapse are not sufficient enough to make me believe in a large conspiracy. The flight 93 and flight 77 alternate theories are only supported by shaky negative evidence (evidence that something that should be there is not equals evidence of something else entirely). I don’t believe the controlled demolition theory of WTC 1 and 2, finding insufficient evidence to support that theory.

    I would support a new commission that answers some lingering questions, but I do not view a failure to do so thus far an indication that there is anything sinister at work.

  31. fair enough!

  32. Half of the people heaping ridicule know perfectly well what,s up. Speaking out and expressing skepticism about nine eleven isn,t a savvy career move …

    Anyway, more videos for the battle weary:

    Bill Cooper calls it (June 2001):
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrTjPGy2k_U

    Peter Dale Scott:
    http://blip.tv/file/1284196

    Long qualification re Bill Cooper:
    William Cooper wasn’t perfect, but who of us is? Sure there’s a lot of noise in his signal, but I think a reasonably educated person w/ the cognitive software to do so can parse his message here: in the coming weeks there’s going to be a major attack which the powers that be will blame on Osama bin Laden: DON’T BELIEVE IT!

    To me it’s absolutely uncontroversial how prophetic he’s being — remember this was in June of 2001 … I’d say, in general, if you’re going to allow your prejudices to override your capacity to think critically/lucidly about things, then that’s your choice … an unfortunate one, but yours nonetheless. Better to be aware of and own your prerogative, lest it derail your life at an inopportune moment.

    And I don’t know about you, but this meme about Islamofascist terrorism I find absolutely mind-numbing… thanks to 9/11 the military industrial project to keep it at bay keeps getting funded and funded and funded and funded — w/ the expected horrific consequences. I feel like I’m living on the nihilist outer fringe of a

  33. There were no commercial planes on 9-11. The entire never ending global US war on terror is based entirely on a murderous fraud to borrow trillions and kill millions. Just like the WMD’s in Iraq…it was a fraud to borrow trillions and kill millions.

    There were no commercial planes on 9-11.

  34. After i realized that some so called conspiracy theory’s had the weight of evidence on their side i wondered why some people would ridicule people for their beliefs in such an aggressive way. I soon can to the conclusion that these people were afraid of what they stood to lose if they believed that the government would tell such big lies to them. They would no longer have someone to hold their hand through every decision making process and tell them what was true or false. The thought of that was too daunting for some and that is why they don’t want to see what the facts are. The words “who can we trust” ring loud in these individuals heads but ultimately they decide that they will continue to believe the mass media and the government. This gives them comfort and a feeling of security. For these reasons it is impossible to argue points of fact with them because they have already made up their minds not to risk their delicate minds. Anger results if you try.

    Oh by the way my mind is still open on the moon landing all i need is another nation to go to the moon and bring back the American flag. That shouldn’t be too hard since 1969 technology wouldn’t be greater that today’s SURELY!! lol

    • Good stuff. If I could agree with you more, I would burst into flames and vaporize leaving no trace of existence, Peter. Common sense truly is a rare commodity these days and a gift, my friend – good to know some of us still have it.

      When all else fails…common sense prevails.

  35. fairly simple

    1. no recordings of bombs on any tape or seismic record.

    2. truthers claims can’t scientific peer review.(nanothermite paper was submitted to a journal who ignores it)

    3. physical evidence, DNA, and eye witness of the planes at all 4 sites.

    4. none of the buildings collapsed like a CD.
    -all were outside of their own footprint & caused damage to the surrounding buildings.
    - both towers had debris preceding collapse. 1 had a collapse initiate at a 20 degree angle.
    - 7′s collapse lasted 18 secs, far beyond free fall. (before commenting see the seismic data & start from the initial collapse of the penthouse)
    - again no recording of explosions.

    for some reason truthers aren’t fans of occam’s razor.

  36. Check out this pdf analysis for the Impossible WTC Twin Towers Collapses with Vector Forces Physics and Math to clearly explain why the media and government are “in your dumb face” lying about the plane and fire induced collapse falsehoods.

    You will need to understand some elementary physics and Vector Math to understand the Impossible Collapses, otherwise you can never understand the Impossible Collapses from a purely quantitative Physics and Math point of view.

    Chuck Boldwyn
    cboldwyn@bellsouth.net for more information

    http://twilightpines.com/911Boldwynn.pdf

  37. My god, truthers make me reconsider my thoughts on euthanasia. I know if I had a dog half as crazy as any of the truthers commenting above, I’d put it down.

  38. wow…what clever writing.
    What a sharp tongue. Is this the reincarnation of Rush Limbaud,
    or Bill O’Rieley? Aboslutely astonishing..!…really..and without
    conscience or facts or anything that would not slap a thinking man in the face.

    you know what..
    This is great food for Sheepele but I think real human beings would starve for lack of substance.

  39. Have you heard the latest? There was no earthquake in Haiti. Weather records prove there was no activity except in one area.
    It was all planned by the Obama Administration. They planted bombs at 100′s of sites to cause what would appear to be an earthquake. Based on the way the homes fell, it is obvious that the damage was not caused by an earthquake. Why did they do this? To declare millions of illegal Hatians in the US “legal” because they can’t go back home. (that’s a lot of new Obama voters). Reason #2 Rebuild Haiti. They are poor and they need help, so what if we had to kill 100,000 or so. That my friends makes just as much sense as the 911 Truthers! Some idiot will probably read this and believe this about Haiti.

  40. what is your game mate you pick out a couple of celebs and drag them through the gutter who are you. you look like a fnj winking at the top of the page.but who knows. aparently the theory of relativity not to mentions newtons law of gravity suddenly becomes aparent because you have the ability to take the piss out of people who will never do anything about your shit bagging. but if they did you would be so starstruck you would piss your pants . i hope this shit site gets you the mainstream job you want so dearly. you think your in touch with popular opinion but your not.answer these people with science employ an engineer or scientist or shut up. a lot of people died you offend me greatly.

  41. Oh my goodness…takes a lot more effort to come up with conspiracies, doesn’t it? Maybe they need to find a hobby in their daily lives because they apparently have too much time on their hands. And seriously, to believe or go along with ANYTHING Spencer or Heidi has to say qualifies you to be referred to as a moron yourself.

  42. Discredit, slander and try to mock people who think for themselves.

    Thats your arguement?

    Foolish, you should be ashamed of yourselves

  43. have you heard some of john lear claims..like he said that he put five highly expierenced pilots in a flight simulator n not one of them could hit a virtual tower..so how did a bunch of rookie pilots manage that..and remember this isnt coming from some lunatic crackpot but a highly intelligent pilot..

  44. Great thing about the truthers is when they try and fail to come off as voice of reason with this crazy stuff. They say there are a few things that need to be answered or things that have never been answered. What they mean is I don’t like the answers and we must admit the 1000 crazy things I heard others say as 100% fact. Any other answer? Well somethings still need to be answered. I think they are made up of anarchist types and stupid people that believe they are super intelligent. The kind you walk away from and tell security about.

  45. So we resort to singling out Celebrities to make a case against 911 Truthers ? MANY Professional Architects and Engineers also have questions. Should we make fun of them too ?
    http://www.ae911truth.org/

  46. @Sad Patriot.

    In a word: yes.

    • @shark: “I don’t get it”

      • interpretation= you’re an idiot!

    • @ shark bait…But of course. Because clearly mainstream mass media and their puppeteer elitist special-interest tyrants know more about intelligible cold hard facts, many of which are Proven; than acknowledged professional architects, engineers, mathematicians, Armed Forces pilots, ex-high ranking officials both military from pretty much all branches & gov’t, investigative reporters, & scientists from around the World, huh.

      Pfft, what was I thinking?

      Now if we could just get them to disclose all 911 information held secret this whole time…that may get us somewhere, no?

  47. I’m a broken hearted republican that spent a year trying to prove the official story was correct. It unfortunately is the biggest conspiracy theory of them all. CIA, Mossad, and a Jewish Criminal Network seem to be primary players and the banking industry and war contractors are the greatest beneficiaries. No war, no profit. Obama is a puppet just like Bush. “presidents are selected, not elected.” FDR

  48. The reason Bin Laden has yet to be caught or is even wanted by the FBI for ANY of the events surrounding 9-11 is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the US government spends billions of dollars a year on infiltrating truth groups and forums , suiciding activists, and staging and writing media propaganda around the world is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that NONE of the voice data recorders, NONE of the flight data recorders, and NONE of the BLACK BOXES had serial numbers….a first in aviation history and it happened 4 times on the same day…is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the US military owned media outlets like GE and Westinghouse who own NBC and CBS will never expose their own crimes of conspiracy to murder is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason it was essential that the images and video of 9-11 be brought to you by a military corporation on the DAY OF 9-11 is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the US government set up the Homeland security agency, TSA, Patriot Act, wiretapping, confessions through torture, and renditions….all to keep you quite and scared about 9-11 is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason Rosie O’Donnell was fired from TV for mentioning the WTC 7 collapse which would immediately expose 9-11 as some form of controlled demolition is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason HUNDRED’s of so-called “terrorist training drills” like Tripod II and Vigilant Guardian were taking place on 9-11….at the exact time of the plane crashes…..was for plausible deniability because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that EVERY TV interview on the DAY OF 9-11 was given by military owned media outlet personnel (watch September Clues online) is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that ALL the buildings and locations on 9-11 appear to have been destroyed by some form of demolition or Directed Energy Weapon is because there was no jet fuel because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the US government allocated only $3 million dollars to investigate ALL of 9-11(Lewinsky Scandal got $50 million) is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason NORAD stood down on 9-11 to immediately intercept the planes was because there were no planes to shoot down because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason EVERY video filming the Pentagon was immediately confiscated (80+ at last count) was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the command procedure to shoot down a rogue plane was changed just weeks before 9-11 to having to get Donald Rumsfeld’s permission first….and then was changed back immediately the day AFTER 9-11 to the pilots discretion…..was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason there were SERIOUS problems with ALL the videos showing planes on 9-11 is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11. Each and EVERY video of 9-11 shows something slightly different..except for a flash?!!!
    The reason a flash was seen just before the “plane” struck the WTC’s 1 and 2 was for consistency with editing at a later date because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason some videos (if they are even real at all) show a “pod” underneath the “plane” is because THAT pod is the actual missile itself and the plane was imposed onto that piece because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11. If you notice the pod is the piece that hits the flash seen in all the videos.

  49. The reason EVERY single video was vetted and controlled by the FBI before anyone in the world saw it was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that there will always be massive problems with the passenger lists and why NONE of the hijackers were listed on ANY of them is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason there will NEVER be a single piece of verified debris from ANY of the 4 planes from ANY of the 4 locations on 9-11 is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that NO engines, NO tail sections, NO seats, NO fuselage, NO luggage, and NOTHING from any of the planes has ever been found and verified through a serial number is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason there are massive problems with the take-off records of the 4 flights on 9-11 is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that NOT ONE PENNY has been paid from insurance companies to replace the planes themselves is because they pay only be verifiable debris….and NONE has ever been found….is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason Bush threatened Congressman to never investigate 9-11, then delayed the investigation 18 months, then handpicked the Commission members, had Commission members quit because they said the Commission was a fraud because they were never going to be allowed to inspect the plane wreckage because of “national security”, and then told them to never “cross the line” with regards to plane investigations……is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that thermite and cordite tested POSITIVE and was found EVERYWHERE on 9-11 is because there was no jet fuel because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that jet fuel tested NEGATIVE at ALL 4 crash sites on 9-11 is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason officers, FBI, and CIA were ordered to spend ALL DAY on the day of 9-11 confiscating film and video from EVERY NYC photo shop was in case someone had developed a photo showing something other than the official photos and videos is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that the WTC towers 1 and 2, which were each 110 stories high of reinforced concrete and steel covering ONE ACRE for each floor…….which was then turned into a pile of dust standing only TWO STORIES HIGH from a fuel fire ( a first in world history)…..was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason CDI, Control Demolition Inc, ( A DEMOLITION COMPANY….even though there was no piece of building debris larger than what could fit onto their existing trucks!) was paid $35 Billion to clean up 9-11 (similar to what the US government paid CDI after the OKCity bombing in 1995) and was seen in and around the WTC’s AND OKCity Murrah building for weeks and months PRIOR to 9-11 and April 1995….was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason everyone smelled cordite and NOT ONE person smelled ANY of the 12,000 gallons of toxic jet fuel at the Pentagon was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9/11.
    The reason NONE of the 600 FBI agents at the Pentagon were wearing masks, even though 12,000 gallons of fuel had just been released, was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason 600 FBI agents were immediately on the scene at the Pentagon even though ALL the roads were supposedly blocked due to traffic is because they were waiting because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason FBI agents were caught on camera dropping off “debris” at the Pentagon is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the Naudet Brothers have not been seen since 9-11, even though they were related to the fire company they just so happen to be filming on 9-11 to capture the ONLY supposed video of the first plane of 9-11…( http://www.spingola.com/jules_naudet.htm) is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the FAA boss destroyed the taped testimony of the 3 air traffic controllers immediately following 9-11 which basically said they could not have been commercial planes….was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9/11.
    The reason 16 supposed Saudi Arabian men who averaged 5’4″ 120 lbs with ONE inch knives could highjack 4 planes without a single mayday or hijacking code being entered by a single pilot on 9-11…was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.

  50. The reason that ALL EIGHT, 6-ton, 9ft wide Titanium alloy engines DISAPPEARED ( a first in world history and it happened 8 times) on 9-11 and have never been physically verified since was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason $15 billion dollars was paid out to the US airline companies within 2 weeks of 9-11 was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the airline insurance companies have yet to pay a single penny to replace a single plane from 9-11 (which by the way they ONLY pay by debris verification)….is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason it is now against US law to investigate or even contact the exact people who took the supposed “man from the street “ films, photos, and videos of planes of 9-11…..it because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason you will never have ANY truly independent investigation of 9-11 is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that everything will be kept in secrecy with regards to any legal procedures, covered with terms like “national security” even though the ENTIRE PLANET supposedly saw it, and ANY court cases will all have gag orders and be closed to the public is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the families will NEVER ask for verification of plane debris from any of the 4 planes from any of the 4 locations on 9-11 is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that NOT ONE single family member gave or demanded a DNA sample or independent test from the planes of 9-11 (which means authorities could never have matched the DNA as positive from the Pentagon Flt. 77 without a sample FROM the family)….is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the NYC CAN ballot will fail miserably for no particular reason, despite having received over 100,000 signatures is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that All court cases regarding 9-11 on behalf of US citizens have gone through ONE judge (happens to be best friends with the WTC lease holder who received $7 Billion when the towers were demolished AND is best friends with Rupert Murdoch who brought the world the ONLY film of planes on the DAY OF 9-11) since 9-11 and he has denied EVERY SINGLE REQUEST for a single trial for the public…is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason Gitmo trials are held in secret and confession by torture is always accepted and legal is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that many victims families feel they have never learned the truth is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason Barry Jennings was murdered just days before the NIST report was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that 2 of the 4 supposed flights on 9-11 were never even scheduled to fly on 9-11 is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason agents say that it’s impossible to stage 9-11 because it would require too many people to be involved and remain quite is because all the agents have been sworn to secrecy and they are all involved because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the original 911 Commission didn’t “go far enough” or verified any debris from any of the planes, was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11
    The reason that witnesses, video, photos, and film…..regardless of how much and how many…..have NEVER in aviation history verified a plane crash EXCEPT ON 9-11 (only debris can verify a plane)…is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the same company AMEC was doing “work” at the WTC’s 1 and 2 buildings, doing “work” at the EXACT wall of the Pentagon that was struck on 9-11, doing “work” at WTC 7 building inside Guiliani’s bunker, and doing “work” at the exact abandoned mine shaft were the plane crashed in Shanksville one month before 9-11…..is because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason that all the video for the weeks and months prior to 9-11 was confiscated from the NYC downtown area which showed demolition companies going in and out of the WTC’s for days and weeks prior to 9-11….was because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason the SAME exact airline investigators from Flt. TWA 800 were used on the “plane of 9-11” is because they follow government orders because there was a missile that brought down TWA 800 and there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11.
    The reason scientists are unable to explain the pyroclastic flow following the collapse of the WTC’s is because it had happened on only TWO occasions in human history…a volcano explosion and a man-made controlled demolition. If you assume no controlled demolition of a building then 9-11 would have been only the 3rd time in human history this event occurred. Why? Because there were no commercial plane crashes on 9-11 and of course the buildings were demolished.

    • Too long. Didn’t read.

      • You are a genius my friend. I mean seriously four words…wow. That is all I have to say.

      • Yes, you did.
        And beverly eckert, you do raise a lot of unanswered questions there.

    • Really? So, where did all the passengers go? Where they all offed by Bush or did they never exist in the first place? What happened to the 22 people that used to go to my church but happened to be in the Pentagon or in the Twin Towers on that day? Were they whisked away to some death pit?

      And…if terrorists had hot-wired the buildings to explode…wouldn’t they have waited until they were actually open for business…say an attack at 3pm?

      You’re more than just a moron

      • Glenn,

        You really shouldn’t be calling anyone a moron as it is clear you are showing your ignorance. Do your research. I used to be like you, laughing at conspiracy theory “nuts”. However, I don’t know anyone that does the research that does not reach the same conclulsions as these “nuts”. There is a reason why thousands of very intelligent engineers, metallurgists, architects, etc, are risking their careers and names in questioning what happened on 9/11. The facts absolutely DO NOT add up! Get away from main stream media and do some of your own investigation. I promise you, you will have a lot more unanswered than answered questions.

        Whether you are a conspiracy theorist, whether you believe it was in “inside job”, or whether you are just someone who is looking for the truth, what they are claiming happened could not have happened. One of my biggest turning points was watching the BBC broadcast in which they reported building 7 as falling 20 minutes before it happened with it still standing behind the reporter…how is that possible. Of course they have all kinds of excuses for it afterhand, but if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, please don’t try and fool me by saying it’s a pig!

        As Abraham Lincoln said “You can fool some of the people all the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all the time”.

        I used to be a nay sayer on the conspiracy theories…but I am a realist and it just don’t add up. For all you people who were like me, I invite you to do the research, come back and still state that you think your gov’t is not lying in some fashion.

  51. Wow, the internet gives rise to some retarded people

    Beverly Eckert being one of them. smh

  52. Beverly Eckert, it literally terrifies me that there are people as obviously articulate as you with that sort of nonsense filling their head. My God, what it must feel like to have that sort of pyroclastic flow in your brain, filling your head with insanity. I pity you and hope you haven’t procreated.

  53. Ad hominem or personal attacks are the number one tactics used by psyop. If you read the 2 replys to Beverlys post they are simple ad hominem attacks in which they reference or refute not one single sentence that was written.

    There were no commercial plane crashes on 9/11. The never ending global US war on terror is a lie. Millions have been slaughtered by the US military based on this intelligence failure. The exposure of no commercial plane crashes on 9/11 will usher in the new world order. The NWO will say that the US can never again be trusted and that the world will demand a ‘global policeman’ such as the NWO. There were no commercial plane crashes on 9/11. Why contiune the lie? Its possible that financial bets have been made to maintain it? There certainly is a great deal of money in its maintanance?

    • And alternatively, the use of sockpuppets is a last-ditch effort by those who can’t substantiate their claims by any other means than hoping that quantity can overwhelm a complete lack of quality.

  54. Thanks Beverley’s sister. That no commercial airlines were involved in 911 when it was witnessed by so many and documented by many others, has to count as among the most hare-brained, nonsensical, ill-conceived and moronic beliefs out there. Thank you for sharing.

    The reason that “NOT ONE single family member gave or demanded a DNA sample or independent test from the planes of 9-11″, is that they were traumatized and don’t want to be pestered by the wide-eyed, looney ravings of a select fraternity of mental midgets.

    Regarding refuting claims…this is much easier to do when there is actual evidence of which you have none.

    In regards to controlled demolition, nobody has been adequately able to explain why terrorists (whose aim is to destabilize populations through maximizing human casualties) would rig explosives to a building that they are going to fly planes into anyway. The chutzpah of going into a building and wiring every floor of it for explosives and doing this undetected, and coordinating efforts with planes which may or may not hit their intended target—and doing this without anyone noticing (security guards, cameras, etc, etc) is quite a leap of, not logic…but something else.

  55. Peer reviewed scientific paper concludes nana thermite is in the 911 dust. There is no way around this scientific fact.

    Just because American military was massed on the Iraq border, and The Patriot Act was written BEFORE 911, does not mean “inside job.”

    Nano thermite is made by Israel, U.S. and Russia. It is used to separate multiple stage rockets and you can’t cook this stuff up in a kitchen or buy it in a hardware store. Still does not mean inside job.

    The fires in WTC7 began in the SEC investigation offices. Doesn’t mean crap.

    The complete disregard for the forensic study of a crime scene, totally understandable.

    Yep, 19 morons under control by a dialysis patient in a Afghanistan cave is what happened. It’s those Arabs that hate us for our freedoms!

    “Inside Job” you say. There are 43 million Americans on food stamps, and 1/7th of America is on public assistance of some sort…Using the formula for unemployment in 1986 25% are out of work. Surely, with this amount of people out of work we would have found out about the “inside job” by now.

  56. “Question everything. Learn something. Answer nothing”

    It’s human nature to be curious, this is how we learn and evolve. People are casted to be lunatics when they question what they have been told… why? People are right when they say the 9/11 ‘truthers’ don’t know the whole story, they aren’t experts. BUT!!! Who’s to say the people that believe 9/11 was an attack from the Middle East have any more knowledge, either. Both sides act superior to one another – with no justification.

    The only people to respect are the ones who have done their own due diligence on a subject, formed a personal opinion by viewing all the facts available to them, and still realize it might be wrong. Even this article here – they denounce a persons beliefs on a subject, without giving any substantial reasons as to why they’re wrong…

    I personally can’t say for certain what happened on 9/11, I do believe there are questions to be answered..

    Ask yourself this, aside from it all. Did Germany know they were the evil ones? Did the romans know they were the evil ones? Did the Brits know they were the evil ones?

    Were they?

    Hear everything… Believe nothing…

    • Jimmy James – Perfect response. Especially the last paragraph about the perception of various groups as being evil. I guarantee the Nazi party hierarchy (at least at the highest level of leadership) thought they were the good guys and fooled millions of countrymen into believing so as well. The Romans? Global domination suggests they were perceived as “the good guys” to some extent.

      Someone following a few of the thought processes earlier in the comments section could say, how do we know the world existed in the year 1300 AD? Were you there? The scary truth would be that they have a somewhat valid point. :)

    • Exactly Jimmy James. Every time someone brings up the 9/11 debate, my thought process just follows what you argued there.

      Here’s my input – Regarding the debate, it doesn’t really matter what you think no matter which side you’re on. It’s what you KNOW that counts. And none of us know enough.

      If you’re going to tell someone they’re wrong, not to mention making fun of them, you have to give reasons why. Acting as if you know the absolute truth – when in fact you don’t – and disrespecting others’ point of views are best ways to lose credibility.

      Simply put, this collection of “thoughts” fails.

      • Exactly Jimmy James. Every time someone brings up the 9/11 debate, my thought process just follows what you argued there.

        Here’s my input – Regarding the debate, it doesn’t really matter what you think no matter which side you’re on. It’s what you KNOW that counts. And none of us know enough.

        If you’re going to tell someone they’re wrong, not to mention make fun of them, you have to give reasons why. Acting as if you know the absolute truth – when in fact you don’t – and disrespecting others’ point of views are the best ways to lose credibility.

        Simply put, this collection of “thoughts” fails.

        Moderate this, Shark Failures.

  57. [...] I’m very proud of this show, it’s called 9-11 LIVE, and it’s awesome and hilarious. We have a celebrity guest host every week. It’s actually in every way identical to SNL except all the jokes have been [...]

  58. Seems to me, on the by and by, that the majority of well-to-do people, have one thing in common (aside from waving off ideas that no-one can fully understand without an objective view) it’s their ability to re-iterate, to see something, make it work and profit from it.
    Yet that in itself will be this war of condemnation. It’s pecular to look around and see the rich lavish themselves with what the poor would kill for. And then see the boys in blue running around to protect everyone’s money. It’s actually kind of funny, when one remembers that it costs big to produce 1. But nearly always, it costs almost nothing (per unit) when producing in the billions.
    It’s funny I’ve always had this begrudging nature towards large money (mainly for the fact that it stagnates an economy out of circulation). But looking back at history, JP Morgan tried to keep all of civilization in the dark for money. Lord Byron did just that. There have been countless and still unwaged wars, battles, raids and espionage over gold, territory, oil, drugs, food, medicine, religion and water.
    But where there’s large amounts of money involved, in a variety of different ways, and in countless places. When “Coincedence” starts stacking up in a variety of different places. When the “unlikely” becomes a reality, but hasn’t become shockingly possible in the past. When 2 incidents occur near simultaniously on either end of the Anglo-american treaty. And when the “Masses” A.K.A. the uninformed, the mentally unevolved, and the average I.Q. Keep blowing smoke up my yingyang to keep things the way they are and they way they like them, I really sit up and start to pay attention.

    I believe the highest IQ in recent history had no love for money, he gave up 10 mil out of freindship, when a buck was actually a buck.

    There weren’t too many of those in history.

    The Rich are destroying the world and it’s peoples, both quickly and slowly, short-term and long-term. Our governments aren’t just helping these eco-terrorists, from the beginning of the industrial age but they are leg deep in league.

    They are Legion.

    Could I put it past the sick not to act sickly?
    Could I put it past the weak not to act weakly?
    Could I put it past the greedy not to act greedily?

    And we need them to… look after us? Govern us?
    trick us out of every cent is more like it. Us, our children, their children, their children’s children, and so on. Until they have it all.

    Do you need to hear it from a teacher to know if it’s true?

    Do you need to see it in the paper?

    Where exactly do you buy into the Idea that our government, or any Government for that matter has ever been anything less than inhumane with a strong desire to inflict terror?

  59. Yep. thats us. the masses. We kill for cash baby. (salsa) Gonna get myself enlisted, unh!

  60. Why don’t you guys spewing all the invectives look at the facts, and use your critical thinking skills. Stop with all the garbage month rhetoric which you feel adds substance to your arguments. That is make the serious attempt to look at the evidence on both sides and come up with your own conclusions…read some of the scientific journals which are refereed by experts in their respective fields and decide whether your judgement about what they have to say, is legitimate, based on rigorous scientific procedures and contribute to genuine inquiry and understanding. If you’re capable of involving your self in this kind of process, perhaps you’ll have something worthwhile to contribute.

  61. Why don’t you guys spewing all the invectives look at the facts, and use your critical thinking skills. Stop with all the garbage month rhetoric which you feel adds substance to your arguments. That is make the serious attempt to look at all the evidence on both sides and come up with your own conclusions…read some of the scientific journals which are refereed by experts in their respective fields and decide whether your judgement about what they have to say, is legitimate, based on rigorous scientific procedures and contribute to genuine inquiry and understanding. If you’re capable of involving your self this kind of process, perhaps you’ll have something worthwhile to contribute.

  62. If you think you are cute making jokes about those who question this obvious lie,why don’t you meet me somewhere? I would like to hear your jokes in person! It has been NINE and a half YEARS since 9-11! You cowardly losers have smirked,giggled,and made fun of the ”kooks” ,often family members,that dare question the official fable.Well,you are not funny and neither is 9-11! One day you will know the truth,and you will be ashamed. Until then I would love to meetcha!I support your right to say what you believe.But have enough class to take 5 minutes to look into something before you go proliferating ignorance. ” He that answers a matter before he hears it, it is folly and shame to him.” -Proverbs 18:3 -Dustin Miller Austin,Tx

  63. There are many more celebs4truth than this! Just come to http://www.celebs4truth.com and see for yourself that there are many, many more celebs, and many more truths to find out!

  64. Pathetic attempt to divert from obviosity (my word).

  65. Thank you for this article! Now i know for sure 9/11 was a Inside Job! xD

  66. [...] those are most likely to be Truthers. I don't know any conservative/Tea Partier who's a Truther. Top 10 Celebrity 9/11 Conspiracy Theory NutjobsMost 9/11 conspiracy theories have been debunked to the point where there is hardly any bunk left to [...]

  67. WANT PROOF THAT THE DEATH OF OSAMA BIN LADEN IS A CONSPIRACY?

    Scam artists have cornered the market on affiliate marketing education. Their sites use aliases, bogus whois info, and registrations in different states and countries. What are they hiding?

    After many years researching, a link appeared on Armand Morin’s blog to Al-Qaeda. A number of these con artist’s faces matched up with the FBI’s MOST WANTED TERRORISTS.

    Here are wanted terrorists, some for U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya & Indonesia. Do these two places ring any bells?

    Search Google Images for;
    Mark Joyner Simpleology-Seif Al Adel (Sarah Palin’s book Palinology)
    John Ferrero-Ramadan Shallah
    Yaro Starak-Umar Patek
    Armand Morin-Noordin M Top (said to have been killed in Indonesia and now removed from the FBI’s most wanted list)
    Michael Filsaime-Ali Sayyid Muhamed Mustafa al-Bakri (Die Hard 4 “Fire Sale” The cyber attack on our infrastructure)
    Dr. Mani Sivasubramanian-Ammar Mansour Bouslim
    Carl Galletti-Ahmed Garbaya, Samir Salwwan
    Ted Ciuba-Abdul Rahman Yasin

    Many get rich quick scams serve as product placement for new cutting edge internet technologies, and logos, some sold through Clickbank. The people appearing in testimonials are part of the expansion of this organization and are often pitching other high priced products and services. They all link to one another through their marketing strategies and ability to optimize in search rankings.

    Between the aliases the use, and the way in which they speak about things, everything they do has double meaning. Here is a code of look a likes pitching all sorts of stuff who are interconnected.

    Selling a program on making millions online is Professor James Bradley who looks like the Pentagon bomber Bill Ayers.

    Jay Conrad Levinson is behind a number of “guerilla” marketing and advertising books. He looks like George Soros, who’s last name is a (palin)drome. Soros has been credited for collapsing a number of nation’s currencies.

    The Super Affiliate Handbook is sold by someone who looks like Jill Biden, her name is Rosalind Gardner. Some appear to represent people, more in how they pose, rather then a direct look a like. Stephen Pierce appears to represent radical Van Jones, Brett McFall-Austan Goolsbee, John Childers-Andy Stern, and Jay Abraham as Ayman al-Zawahri.

    Problem with your Google Adwords PPC ads and can’t get a straight answer? You could try Yanik Silver who looks a lot like Sergei Brin, but he probably won’t know. He sells 33 Days to Online Profits (prophets.) Why not try Perry Marshall, who looks like Obama’s priest Reverend Pfleger? He sells The Definitive Guide To Google Adwords, infringing upon Google’s trademark.

    Many more can be seen at Lorrie Morgan Ferrero’s Red-Hot-Copy.com blog such as; 72 Virgin Records Richard Branson, & White House Party Crashers the Salahi’s with Valerie Jarrett’s daughter.

    The Rich Jerk sent out emails promoting Stompernet in Atlanta Georgia. The staff included Brad Fallon, an airline pilot, and Eben Pagan selling a seminar “Get Altitude”. 3 days after reporting this code to the FBI, Delta in Atlanta canceled a large number of flights due to safety reasons. In the Youtube videos related to the Rich Jerk, it appears that Mark Cuban is the Rich Jerk. He’s the billionaire who owns the Dallas Maverick’s basketball team. Think O’bomber or Barrac-uda Palin would play for him? Another guy claiming to be Robert Johnson Rich Jerk is Tony Rezko.

    Obama announced his run for office on Oprah Winfrey’s show. Have you ever noticed that Oprah’s shopping friend Gayle King looks a lot like Whitney Houston? Did you ever think that her name could be a code, Whit_ney White-Hous_ton House?

    In my strongest opinion this is the last piece of the puzzle, Osama Bin Laden is also a spokesperson, and a look-a-like. Osama represents Obama/Biden (Bi)n La(den.)

    NOT CONVINCED THAT THE DEATH OF OSAMA BIN LADEN IS A CONSPIRACY? THEN WHY HAS THIS BEEN DELETED REPEATEDLY FROM MAJOR NEWS SITES?

    LEARN MORE HERE AT THE OSAMA BIN LADEN KILLED CONSPIRACY

  68. Hehe yup another ignorant hit piece littered with ad hominem. Good that more people are ignoring tripe like this and opening their eyes to how the world really works. The poverty of the arguments used by those who defend the official story is self-evident in the fact that they constantly have to recourse to name-calling.

  69. The Death of Osama Bin Laden and the Obama Illuminati Conspiracy

    My name is Aaron M Fleszar, and for the last several weeks I’ve tried getting people to read and understand some of what I’ve written online. For most, its way too complicated. On a number of blogs I made the mistake of trying to optimize for keyword phrases, which took away from the information I was revealing. There should be more than enough information online now for people to connect the dots. It’s important to get everyone’s attention by telling them about sites like this one.

    The media is being heavily controlled in an effort to stop the story spreading about Obama/Osama and the New World Order. This is why I think the death of OBL story was released, to take attention way. I cracked Al-Qaeda’s code over 3 years ago. It was about 6 months before the presidential election. This is part of the reason why I know that everything regarding Sarah Palin is completely fabricated. There’s a reason why her family has such odd names. There’s also a reason why on her TV show it appeared that everything they did in Alaska was for the first time. Wouldn’t the group who wanted to elect Obama, be more likely to pull it off if they also decided who his opponent, or opponents, would be? Sarah Palin generated a lot of chatter for the feds to analyze. People online are already trying to discredit what I’m claiming about her. How many people do you know who’ve visited Alaska in the last decade? And out of those all those who have, how many spent time at the Governor’s office?

    If you search who I am online and read about what I’ve written, you should also know that the Feds sorted out all of this before the election. Think if my theory is accurate Bush would hand over the presidency to his nemesis? Did you notice that immediately after Obama won the election, he completely disappeared for 2 weeks? When Obama reappeared and sat next to “senator” McCain for a photo shoot, did you notice how happy and refreshed McCain was? Did you notice how Obama had that sleep deprivation, cooperating with authorities, look on his face?

    I also know that this story is considered embarrassing to intelligence agencies and the FBI who have been after Al-Qaeda for years. They claim that this information is a matter of National Security. Misusing the words national security all the time is a threat to our nation’s security. Avoiding the court systems, warrants, judges, trashing the constitution, and operating in an above-the-law capacity, is a threat to national security. Using the words national security, in exchange for the words job security, is a threat to national security. Turning people who are part of this organization in an effort to catch bigger fish, and catching bigger fish only to have unelected officials silence and manipulate elected officials, is a threat to national security. The American people want their freedoms and democracy back. Together we can restore the constitution before unelected officials begin using it as toilet paper.

    The feds have recruited journalists, editors, and moderators, in order to control the media and suppress this story. Forums, blogs, and major media comment sections are being manipulated, altered, and deleted. Most comments on these sites are nothing more than misdirection. Anyone speaking negative about the administration, or poking holes in the Death of Osama Bin Laden story, are being immediately discredited, some by the FEDS and others by Al-Qaeda. It also appears Al-Qaeda is copying my information into forums. Never LOG INTO a forum regarding the Illuminati or New World Order, they’ll hack your computer. Tell everyone about this site.

    Commenting at major news sites isn’t spamming unless you’re selling something. Here are the best ways to get attention to this story.

    First, email and text everyone you know and tell them about this website. It’s quick, easy, and simple.

    Next, post questions at the biggest major media sites to all political stories. Ask if the person is part of the New World Order Conspiracy, or use Obama Osama Illuminati conspiracy. Comment on stories regarding Obama as well, he’s in the news an awful lot. Reply to the most viewed and most replied comments. When you see others drawing attention to this story or this site, support them online. You can always link or send someone a link to this site as well. This is America. Don’t ever be scared for a minute to speak out. We control the government, not the other way around.

    Simply reading this story is meaningless, unless you spread this information. Even if you don’t understand it all, if everyone begins to share it, actual journalists, maybe from outside the United States, will pick up on it and be able to expose it without being limited to a short little blog post. Spread the news today and help us take back our democracy, the constitution, and our freedom of speech.

    Thank you,
    Aaron Fleszar

  70. Meh, another crappy article trying to make the smug author feel superior about themself. Everyone has a belief that would be considered insane by most of society, including the author. I don’t believe that 9/11 was an inside job, but conspiracies are hatched every single day. Anyone who denies that conspiracies happen all the time is an idiot, so criticizing something from a conspiracy angle is just stupid.

  71. [...] and purposefully did nothing. That the truthers have gained sounding boards with popular athletes, celebrities, and at least one former governor, is a testament to their [...]

  72. [...] and purposefully did nothing. That the truthers have gained sounding boards with popular athletes, celebrities, and at least one former governor, is a testament to their [...]

  73. That’s right. Believe everything your government tells you like a nice little pawn.

  74. Yes, because the alternatives are so much more reasonable:

    “Sir, will you leave your cubicle for a few hours and excuse me while I set up your office building for controlled demolition?”

    Bush govt braintrust: “I have an idea, why don’t we attack our own citizens, risk our positions, and our lives if anyone should find out and decimate our economy for the foreseeable future?! Wow, that is a smashing idea!”

  75. Lol Conspiracy nutjobs are so crazy…. I read this crap for entertainment i respect a good conspiracy theorist like believing 9 11 was done for provoking a war on terror… But saying the worlds going to end by fema camps… and chips in our heads… its just crazy… Now the HIV is not real to control population… THATS REAL!

  76. this article is a hatchet hit piece by some dickhead who loves the government and the establishment

    Just rubbish

  77. “How big a lunatic do you have to be to witness two jet airliners filled with jet fuel slam into buildings on live TV, triggering a massive inferno that burned for two hours and then think ‘Well, if you believe that’s the cause…’” Bill Maher

    Bill Maher who is Jewish ( surpise surprise) says it was Muslims who did it. Several problems with his supposed comedy script
    1) Tower 2 burnt for 54 minutes and Tower 1 for about 90 minutes ( thats not 120 minutes is it)

    2) Building 7 was not not by a plane and is NEVER mentioned by Mr I think I am being funny

    3) Jet fuels is basically Kerosene and even uner OPTIMUM conditions cannot reach temperatures hot enough to melt or even critically weaken steel

    4) contrary to false accounts by BBC etc. The WTC towers were not hollow, they each contained 47 MASSIVE structural steel columns going to the basement getting thicker as they went down, As steel is a massive heat sink the building fires COULD NOT result in total collapse COULD NOT

    5) whoever wrote this atrocious hit piece deserves the utmost condemnation and is in effect an apologist for state sponsored mass murder

  78. Maher is an idiot. I can’t wait till the world wakes up…it’s going to shock these liars, truth has slapped them in the face so many times – they’ll cry like babies.

  79. For some real insight go to:

    http://www.jimmylongshot.com/music.html

    As we all know the media is controlled. Talk radio and most of all BOOKS are the only place where honest debate occures unlike the commentator of the above article. JR

  80. Sites like this make me sick…………they list people who others consider a little “quirkie” to make this movement look bad……..If you are serious about knowing the TRUTH try looking at these sites……….There are lots more but can’t remember the names of all of them……………….After opening these sites REALLY look at who these people are . You will soon realize that these folks are some of the smartest in the world and are NOT ONE BIT “QUIRKIE at all !!

    http://mp911truth.org/

    http://www.militaryofficersfor911truth.org/

    http://mp911truth.org/

  81. This is an addition to the post I just made…………….

    These sites are even better than the previous ones…………

    I challenge anyone to look these up……..EVEN BILL MAHR !!

    ae911truth.org

    patriotsquestion911.com

  82. This article is pure crap, all the proof and evidence that proves that 9-11 was an inside job, is invalid because Popular Mechanics deems it so? They claim all these are debunks because they get one or two so called experts to say so. Popular Mechanics says the Government showed them all the proof that It was a terrorist attack. But we the people are not allowed to see this so called proof. You guys are going to have to do better then that. You guys want to debate this in a civil manner, bring it!! You are going to loose, in a Debate if one side can’t rationally counter the argument and resort to insults and childish name calling its called Ad Hominem and you have lost the argument period.

    y

  83. You, thesharkguys , are a pair of yoyal A**holes, you may even be payed to spread you lies, anyone with half a brain knows 911 was an Inside Job by Israelis Jewish MOSSAD secret service and the US Govt.

    thesharkguys your probably jews yourseleves thats why your spreading your filthy dishonest lies, your full of sh1t

    thesharkguys dropdead, people are waking up to the truth of the jew-led attacks.

  84. Wow.. a lot of crazy people talking about the ” conspiracy theory”

    I only have three questions:
    1. How did Building 7 come down without being hit by an air plane? Desk fires and damage from the twin towns was the governments explanation. Really?? A 47 story building of steal came down in 13 seconds because of desk fires? It came down in a controlled style demolition fashion, the EXACT SAME way as the twin towers came down hours before.. but totally unrelated? (because it was not hit by an airplane) And there has been no steal structure IN THE WORLD that has fallen because of fire. (even buildings that had burned for 18 hours at extreme heats) No other building in the world has fallen because of fire… expect for the twin towers… and building Number 7.. (that was NOT hit by a plane) What a COINCIDENCE? The first steal structure in the WORLD that has totally collapsed because of fire (and in 13 seconds.. similar to a controlled style demolition) 1,300 engineers and architects say it is impossible for this to happen because of a fire and any damage from the twin towers. Wow.. well if that is what the GOVERNMENT said.. then I believe it… and these cooks that are questioning it… what nut bags! As patriotic Americans.. we need to ignore physics, 1300 experts, and common sense.

    2. The pentagon building being hit by an airliner??? The cooks say NO airplane hit the building… it was either a missile or a bomb!!!
    Well there are 85 video cameras around the pentagon. This will be easy to prove.. just show the videos.. then these cooks will shut up.
    But the pentagon/government will NOT show a video of a AIRPLANE crashing. The only video they would release is of the blast. (no clear picture of an airplane!! a five frame clip) WHAT????
    There are other businesses with video cameras nearby, that could have possibly shown an airline hitting the pentagon. The government took the video tapes within hours of the crash…. but will not release them. The government has many videos of the event…. they admit that they have the videos, but will NOT RELEASE THEM!!!.. Why don’t they release them??? Why are they not in the 911 Commission Report???
    My question is WHY? (my understanding is they will not release them because of national security?))) what does that mean) If you have a video in the front lawn of an airliner coming to crash into your building.. what is the secrete?? What is the hidden thing that the American people are not allowed to see?? hummmmm What a Coincidence??

    Just on a side note.. looking at the scene, and evidence… I dont see how a hug airline could fly that close to the ground before hitting the pentagon. For these reasons:
    1. There was not evidence of a HUGE plane flying that close to the ground and not leaving marks on the trees, the lawn etc… look at the pictures of the news casts.
    2. I don’t think a person/ terrorists with just a little airline experience, could fly that huge complex airplane and hit the target exact. Do you???
    3. It is my understanding that experienced airline pilots said that they could not have flow that flight plan and hit the pentagon in that way. They say it would be impossible for any airline to fly the path.
    4. I don’t see how a plane of that size could have left a hole of that size….. investigate the facts yourself to see what you think.
    5. I don’t see how the news cast pictures would not have shown ANY wreckage of a plane. Where is the plane? Where is the luggage? etc..
    But the black box will tell.. right? The black boxes that are designed to withstand a plane crash… it was discovered (according to the government.. thank goodness) but.. shot… it was not functional. .. What a coincidence.
    But question yourself … I am not a pilot.

    3. Donald Rumsfeld said that they were missing 2.3 TRILLION dollars on September 10, 2001. (this is a fact.. watch the youtube video) Was that money ever found?? (it is my understanding that computers that had the information to the missing money, were destroyed in the exact pentagon explosion.) hummmm
    My question.. was this 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS ever found? What a COINCIDENCE that the day after we had a major news story that took the attention away from our missing 2.3 Trillion dollars.

    Quote: Don’t pee on my leg and tell me it’s raining
    Judge Judy

    Thank you famous celebrities for speaking up.. at risk of your reputation .. because you know in your heart it is right.

  85. Central question: You’re a terrorist and want to create the most casualties possible. So, instead of bombing a different building, you decide to “control demolish” a building you’re already planning on hitting with a plane and killing lots of people.

    You’re a terrorist: you decide to bomb a building that was already attacked in 1993. Yes, they would not suspect a thing! Genius!
    Idiocy.

    Not to mention the lunacy of bombing a building with thousands of people working there. What do you do, tell them to take a sick day so you can rig the place with explosives? Everybody out, we’ve got work to do on every floor!

    And if this is such a sophisticated operation, someone could’ve pulled a switch and maximized casualties? The majority of people were able to get out out of the buildings. Oh yeah. Forgot. It was the government. They are evil schemers, but not THAT evil

    So, they used planes for WTC, but in the planning stages thought: “enough with the planes! Let’s use a missile instead for the Pentagon!”

    Basement dwelling knuckleheads producing grainy videos cited as evidence by bat-shit crazy lunatics. What about Rumsfeld? What about a reference you ding bats. Since when would people listen to monumental intellects like Rosie O’Donnell?

  86. […] Remember Marion Cotillard, who won an Oscar for her brilliant, astonishing portrayal of Edith Piaf in the movie “La Vie En Rose?’ What happened to her? What about Willie Nelson? Did you know he said he knows 9/11 was a controlled demolition, which he knows because he has seen casinos in Las Vegas being demo’d? I googled “celebrities for 9/11 truth” and there are very very few results, and you will see why when you read this how they are cut down, mercilessly insulted, and made to look like the biggest tinfoil-hat nutters on earth. Just for doubting the “9/11 Commission,” without even mentioning anything about jews or Israeli involvement! If 80% of the population disbelieves the “official story,” then why doesn’t the entertainment industry reflect that simple demographic? Because it kind of looks like the jews who control the banks and media, and own all 8 major motion picture studios, are weeding out those who do not tow the line! Any idiot should immediately be able to what has been going on just by this one thing alone. I still know hundreds of people in the industry that I talk to, and not one of them has, in the course of our private conversations, ever denied the legitimacy of anything I have said about 9/11, JFK, WW I and II, but they are too apparently terrified to mention anything publicly. Anyway, read this article and you will get a sense of the vicious, deceitful, tyrannical, hate-filled tactics of our enemies. The key to winning this fight is not trash-talking jews, but rather highlighting their own behavior and statements, and drawing them out and making them demonstrate publicly what a bunch of racist, rabid, intolerant freaks they are, totally incapable of honest self reflection. Everything they say is just “antisemitism this holocaust denial that, nazis, Hitler blah blu blee blah,” and it’s all total nonsense. Let them do all the work, they will go full retard right on cue, every time, throwing a red-in-the-face, infant-style temper tantrum, while you just point and laugh. Ask questions like “how were muslims with box-cutters able to get NORAD to stand-down,” how were muslims with box cutters able to take down WTC 7?” “Oh really? What were MOSSAD agents doing with vans loaded with tons of explosives in Manhattan on 9/11? Why has the FBI never charged bin Laden with a crime for 9/11?” etc etc. It is easy as pie and will provide you with hours of fun. ok sorry for digressing…this is turning into another post, I think.  http://www.thesharkguys.com/lists/top-10-celebrity-911-conspiracy-theory-nutjobs/ […]

Feed     Email     Facebook     Follow on Twitter

 


"Often irreverent and outrageous ... and always funny."
Buy the New E-Book Tastes Like Human
"Fast and funny with the facts, without the morality."
Buy the 1st Shark Book

Popular Posts




Twitter


Recent Comments

Recent Posts