<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Offensive Religious Art Pieces Part Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesharkguys.com/2009/05/20/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesharkguys.com/2009/05/20/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-two/</link>
	<description>Humor, Top 10 Lists, comedy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:59:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OrugTor</title>
		<link>http://www.thesharkguys.com/2009/05/20/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2726</link>
		<dc:creator>OrugTor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesharkguys.com/?p=4063#comment-2726</guid>
		<description>Noel/Chris, nice job on the commentary. Generated a few chuckles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel/Chris, nice job on the commentary. Generated a few chuckles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smeky</title>
		<link>http://www.thesharkguys.com/2009/05/20/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>Smeky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesharkguys.com/?p=4063#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>lol... that&#039;s not fair frank, I&#039;m white like paper and I&#039;m not racist. I wouldn&#039;t care what color my slaves are 
I didn&#039;t get what exactly you were saying but I give you a big squishy hug anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol&#8230; that&#8217;s not fair frank, I&#8217;m white like paper and I&#8217;m not racist. I wouldn&#8217;t care what color my slaves are<br />
I didn&#8217;t get what exactly you were saying but I give you a big squishy hug anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank s</title>
		<link>http://www.thesharkguys.com/2009/05/20/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>frank s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesharkguys.com/?p=4063#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>what pussy&#039;s picking on people who they know wont do shit and dare say its to make a statement or piss people off. 

yeah the church did seek retribution for “offenses” against them, with that same logic white people are all racist because they owned slaves and are all still racist but just cant show there true feelings because society forces it upon them to act good. face it no matter what the past was the current church (regardless of how it got there) is more tolerant then it has ever been and picking on them is the most pathetic form of fighting the &quot;evil religious machine&quot; that Islam currently is. who knows maybe they will become tolerant too but i doubt it. 

so go ahead keep picking on Christians because you don&#039;t have the balls to make an actual statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what pussy&#8217;s picking on people who they know wont do shit and dare say its to make a statement or piss people off. </p>
<p>yeah the church did seek retribution for “offenses” against them, with that same logic white people are all racist because they owned slaves and are all still racist but just cant show there true feelings because society forces it upon them to act good. face it no matter what the past was the current church (regardless of how it got there) is more tolerant then it has ever been and picking on them is the most pathetic form of fighting the &#8220;evil religious machine&#8221; that Islam currently is. who knows maybe they will become tolerant too but i doubt it. </p>
<p>so go ahead keep picking on Christians because you don&#8217;t have the balls to make an actual statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thesharkguys.com/2009/05/20/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesharkguys.com/?p=4063#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Jesus freak, for proving my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Jesus freak, for proving my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus freak</title>
		<link>http://www.thesharkguys.com/2009/05/20/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1315</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus freak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 07:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesharkguys.com/?p=4063#comment-1315</guid>
		<description>Damn you. You&#039;re blasphemers yourselves just for republishing this filth. God saves us all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn you. You&#8217;re blasphemers yourselves just for republishing this filth. God saves us all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thesharkguys.com/2009/05/20/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesharkguys.com/?p=4063#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>Yes Matt, that is REAL interesting. Until I remember that when Christians had the social power to seek retribution for &quot;offenses&quot; against them, they more often than not oppressed perceived blasphemes with great brutality. Just because secular rationality has made an indelible enough image in the West that Christianity is no longer a major political consideration, doesn&#039;t mean that the church has become more enlightened on it&#039;s own accord. Rather, it was forced to be that way in order to maintain it&#039;s ever-decreasing flock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Matt, that is REAL interesting. Until I remember that when Christians had the social power to seek retribution for &#8220;offenses&#8221; against them, they more often than not oppressed perceived blasphemes with great brutality. Just because secular rationality has made an indelible enough image in the West that Christianity is no longer a major political consideration, doesn&#8217;t mean that the church has become more enlightened on it&#8217;s own accord. Rather, it was forced to be that way in order to maintain it&#8217;s ever-decreasing flock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thesharkguys.com/2009/05/20/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesharkguys.com/?p=4063#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>The interesting thing is that 7 of the 10 could be considered offensive to Christians.  Amazingly enough there haven&#039;t been riots, death threats, bounties and violence as a result of most, if not all, of these pieces of art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting thing is that 7 of the 10 could be considered offensive to Christians.  Amazingly enough there haven&#8217;t been riots, death threats, bounties and violence as a result of most, if not all, of these pieces of art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens</title>
		<link>http://www.thesharkguys.com/2009/05/20/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesharkguys.com/?p=4063#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>i take it you haven&#039;t heard scottish comedian Billy Connolly&#039;s version of the last supper set in Glasgow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i take it you haven&#8217;t heard scottish comedian Billy Connolly&#8217;s version of the last supper set in Glasgow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
